Editorial Policy

How we research, source, and maintain everything we publish.

Our guides and original-data studies exist to help people choose and use campaign-link tools well — including when the honest answer is a competitor. These are the standards every piece is held to.

Sourcing

• Every statistic is sourced. Numbers are attributed to a primary or otherwise reputable source and linked inline. We prefer standards bodies, vendor documentation, and official pages over aggregators.
• No fabricated data. We do not invent figures, studies, or quotes. If a claim can't be sourced, we drop it or state it plainly as our own experience.
• Vendor prices are dated. Competitor pricing reflects publicly listed plans as of the stated month and is cited to the vendor's own page; we tell you to re-check before buying.

Original research

When we run our own studies (for example, how long short links survive, or which QR generators expire), we publish the method and sample so the result is reproducible, and we label the limits of what we measured. We never dress an estimate as a measurement.

Translations

Our localized pages (German, French, Spanish, Dutch, Italian) are native, human-quality translations that are independently reviewed — not raw machine output. Numbers and sources are preserved exactly across languages.

Freshness and corrections

Every article carries an accurate published and last-updated date, and we update the content — not just the date — when the facts change. A modification date always reflects a real change. If you spot an error, email contact@whooshly.co and we'll correct it.

Independence

Whooshly publishes comparisons that rank its own product, and we disclose that on the page. We cite every competitor's price to the vendor's own source and say plainly where a rival is the better choice. Our goal is to be the answer worth citing, which only works if it's true.